.

Fierce Walmart Debate at Shrewsbury Hearing

The conceptual site plan offers answers, but residents remain concerned.

New details about the potential shape of the proposed Kenrick Plaza redevelopment provoked more questions than answers at a public meeting held at Shrewsbury City Hall Tuesday night.

More than 100 people filled the city hall’s ballroom to ask the Shrewsbury Board of Aldermen and city officials about the Kenrick Plaza overhaul. As with past meetings, the plan drew both condemnation and praise, with both cheers and jeers drawing applause.

The conceptual site plan posted on the city’s website prior to the meeting showed a possible layout that would level the uneven terrain of the area, construct several new retail spaces and cut off access to Watson Road from Trianon Drive and Kenrick Manor Drive. At the heart of the proposal by developer G.J. Grewe is the construction of a 124,000 square-foot Walmart as an “anchor” store.

However, much about the proposal remained uncertain. Outlines showing where new stores might be located or existing business relocated were left blank. Illustrations displayed landscaping perspectives for the front and rear entrances but didn’t provide a concept for the look of the retail giant in the middle, Walmart.

“When you use the word conceptual, it’s a pretty loose term,” said Bill Hartrich, a member of the Shrewsbury Citizen’s Advisory Committee. “I would like to see something more detailed with what it is actually going to look like.”

Mayor Felicity Buckley emphasized the plan could easily change and discussions with Grewe remain ongoing. How much the city will benefit financially also remains uncertain. The city’s financial advisor, Mark Grimm, estimated that the development could bring an extra $500,000-800,000 in net tax revenue and said research is being done to arrive at an exact figure.

As in previous meetings, the Kenrick Manor Drive/Trinidad Drive cutoff was a primary concern for many opposed to the plan. The street is currently used by residents in the subdivisions behind Kenrick to travel to Watson Road.

“Is the opening of Walmart and closing of Kenrick Manor Drive indivisible?” asked Shrewsbury resident Nick Slais.

The plan doesn’t completely restrict access: residents would be able to get to Watson Road by entering just north of the Kenrick Antique Mall and winding through the parking lot. Buckley responded by explaining that the decisions to close the more direct route was not a request of the developer.

“It was a result of a lot of input we had had from citizens over there who were concerned about doubling the traffic they already have,” Buckley said. “They were concerned about having cut-through traffic and development traffic. Even if we did a different developer and a different retailer, we would have the same issue.”

The answer did little to satisfy Shrewsbury resident Sue Leon, who argued that by closing off Kenrick Manor the traffic influx from areas north of the city would simply be shifted farther up.

“So you just move it up to Weil [Avenue] then?” Leon said.

Others were not opposed to redeveloping Kenrick Plaza but were against Walmart on principal, including former Shrewsbury resident Ben Krauss. Krauss arrived at the meeting early and said he was bothered by the retail giant’s decision to not allow its employees to unionize.

“I am hoping we can hold out and wait and something better will come along,” he said. “We have way too many Walmarts and they don’t have a good track record of taking care of their employees.”

However, other residents expressed support for the proposal as the meeting drew to a close. Sandy Odenwald asked her fellow citizens to put aside any anti-Walmart feelings and focus on the bigger picture.

“It’s for the betterment of the whole community that we have some revenue to keep our taxes down and bring more people in to the community,” Odenwald said.

For one resident the potential tax revenue to keep city services running provided a very personal reason to back the redevelopment plan. The individual told a story of her 11-year-old son who had badly fractured his leg. Emergency’s responders from Shrewsbury had the child on the way to the hospital in minutes, she said.

The general hearing ended at 8 p.m. and the meeting was then broken into three smaller Q&A sessions for each of the city’s three wards. There, citizens had the chance to speak directly with their aldermen and the arguments for and against the controversial development continued unabated.

Kevin Chau June 29, 2011 at 12:28 PM
I wish I had a say in this development, but I don't live in Shewsbury. Heres my opinion: I don't think a Wal-mart will attract more people, reason, “We have way too many Walmarts." I personally would like to see something that represents Shrewsbury, St. Louis, or Missouri; something that gives character. I am really hoping Wal-mart is not the county's character.
Tony Rivera June 30, 2011 at 01:32 AM
Folks don't understand that you can't block wal-mart per se. But you can block a developer who has a history of suing cities he works with, threatening to close retail unless he gets public money for routine work, and sitting on decaying properties until they get blighted and eligible for TIF money. Do you realize that Grewe is the manager of Kenrick Plaza I? Does anyone even question how we can give him public money as a reward for letting it rot? Check out stlcities.com
Tony Rivera June 30, 2011 at 01:39 AM
I love how people immediately assume that if we don't have extra tax revenue, the FIRST thing that would be cut are firefighters and police. In fact, I bet $100 that the person giving the emotional story of a broken leg on a kid was a relative or close friend of a Shrewsbury firefighter or police officer. Does anyone understand that the city subsidizes the swimming pool more than the entire tax revenue of Kenrick Plaza? Does anyone question how the city can threaten the loss of public safety officials but can lie and deceive us about spending over half a million dollars on a pool house that wasn't even rebuilt like they claimed it needed to be? Or why we spent forty THOUSAND dollars on a blinky sign in front of city hall? Or a hundred thousand dollars (and all the water bills) for a new irrigation system? Or the same amount for a generator at city hall? Yet somehow, if the tax money dries up, police officers and firefighters will be the first to go??? Give me a BREAK. They city just doesn't want to cut spending, so they trot out the old firefighters and police offers to scare people again. Gates did it, and now I'm afraid the current administration is doing it.
Jackie Johnson July 03, 2011 at 06:57 PM
Keep in mind, people of Shrewsbury, Walmart goes no where on their own dollar, and forces those that did spend their own dollar right out of town. How much is Walmart getting in tax breaks and road work should be your question.
Tony Rivera July 13, 2011 at 12:34 AM
Jackie, do you understand that Wal-Mart is not asking for tax breaks? The developer is. He is not wal-mart. He sits on decaying properties (some of which HE is supposed to be managing!) and threatens cities until they turn over public money to him. The only real question is: why do Shrewsbury officials think this will turn out any better than the path of destruction left by Grewe in any number of other municipalities?
Andrew Dana Hudson October 13, 2011 at 09:20 PM
Hey everyone, I took down a comment here. We don't allow personal attacks on other users. As it says in our terms of use, “Keep it clean,” “Don’t try to trick people,” and “Treat others as you’d like to be treated.” It looks like I also need to remind everyone that our terms of use ask commenters to include their full names. Tony and Keith, if you could add your last names to your user profile, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, and keep commenting!
Tony Rivera October 13, 2011 at 10:38 PM
Done and done. To add another point to this story - the entire amount of fines sitting uncollected in the Shrewsbury court basement is equal to three times the entire sales tax revenue of Kenrick Plaza. Or to put it another way - if we are so concerned about the blight condition at Kenrick, doing what our city codes say (fining the owner $500 per day until it is fixed) would have resulted in either a fixed-up property suitable for occupancy, or $180,000 in fine revenue from the owner for letting it decay. . You don't have to fork over taxpayer money to this place.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something